Tuesday, 12 November 2013

Can't equalize...

She grew up and one day realized,
Yet minimized, the power she had.
The power to make them come... compromise their life, their wife.
She messed up. A close-up materialized.
She was demonized, but not the lad.
The power to make them come...  Nothing but a strife.
She dried up and never realized, 
They can't sympathize or equalize...
nothing to add.

Sunday, 10 November 2013

Think twice


Think twice.
Avoid useless gander,
Don't be a lost wander
With no goals on his list.
Thoughts are catalysts,
Explosive reaction, Immediate action, Canalized emotion... Blocked confusion.
Deep cerebral activity, shifting tragedy.
Think twice, your brain is a free device.


Thursday, 14 February 2013

Same-sex marriage and its implications for the respect of difference and diversity within society



 
The Western world has considerably changed. My country has considerably changed. We have apparently become convinced, for the most part, that sex and gender no longer matter, that the feminine and the masculine are the very same.

In February 2013, the UK and France passed a law to change the institution of marriage which was initially supposed to be a contract binding together a man and a woman, the two elements necessary to the creation of another human being, male or female.

Now, marriage is no longer the union of a couple, but of pairs too. Yes, semantically it makes a difference, at least in the French language. A couple is a combination of two different elements, (often masculine and feminine) and a pair a combination of two similar elements (pair of scissors, pair of trousers, and so on.)

Therefore, from now on, French law considers that gender no longer has relevance, that masculine and feminine do not exist, and that two women and two men are just the same as a man and a woman. And this, despite the fact that science will never prove, not even support such claims. Now, you marry one person to another person, regardless of their sex, regardless of their gender.

There is no differentiation between the sexes and between genders, they are all the same. However they are still highly unequal. Women are still paid less for the same work, are still doing more housework than men and still surfer more violence than man (and that just the most cliché and basic social injustices).

I would have loved for all these government to be less demagogic and more pragmatic. What do we really need to build equality between the sexes? Same-sex marriage? That’s what you think? For all that I know, such useless law does not even strengthen equality between two men and two women. Instead, I would have loved to see them claim back the rule of law, the active implementation of all the brilliant laws that have been made to enhance gender equality, to protect the oppress, to share the wealth and promote social justice all these laws that still remain poorly enforced. Now, we can more about silly and useless laws that for months distract our parliaments from the real issues, while also taking away the attention of the general public from what really matters. What’s wrong with us?

On top of it, it makes me feel that children are now even more considered as items and mere merchandise in our societies.  I am saying this because I have never been a big fan of growing humans in test-tubes in order to merely give satisfaction to the individualist humans who cannot accept the fact they cannot have children. As if people were saying “It’s my right to have children and no one can take this away from me...” Here goes the claim of the selfish individualist, the empty consumption-driven individual who makes up our “modern” and “civilized” societies.

But let us get back to the implications of the confusion around same-sex marriage... On the one hand, the government, and (apparently?) a majority within Western society, consider that sex and gender no longer matter, that despite being male and female, it is in fact all the same, even though they remains highly unequally treated across societies and cultures worldwide.

However, on the other hand, other parts of society, often the conservative parts of society, the right-winged parts of the society and the religious parts of society have a problem with this and refuse to accept that sexes and genders are the same. These parts of society also reveal interesting facts.  

Indeed, these various conservative parts are also the ones that call Muslims backward and unjust to women, and who want to see Muslims shackled and prevented from expressing their identities and from performing their acts of worships and other rituals. Yet, Muslims are considered as highly conservative regarding same-sex marriage, thus having more in common with those who reject them.

Conservatives believe that a family unit is composed of a couple able (or not) to conceive children without a third person entering the unit. They believe that a man and a woman give balance to a family unit. In France in particular, when a couple gets married they receive a “livret de famille”, a family notebook, which proves that marriage is more than a civil union/partnership, it is the foundation of the family unit.

The usual argument against this claim is that a pair of men or a pair of women may be fitter to raise a kid than a man and a woman. Of course, all humans regardless of their sex are different (psychologically and intellectually for instance) and some may completely fail as parents. But that’s really not what’s important here, and not what I am here to discuss.

The point I am trying to make here is that those who have been fighting Muslims for voicing out loud their belief that men and women are different, are now in the streets claiming the very same belief as Muslims. Indeed, please remember that French Muslims, and most Muslims in the West, consider that men and women are not the same, but they are equal. They can reach the very same intellectual level, the very same spiritual level.

Nevertheless, even though they may even experience the same range of emotions, or the psychological problems, we all know that, for the most part, men and women have different ways of experiencing, of feeling, of coping, etc. And that is due to physiological and biological mechanisms which are uncontrollable parameters, as well as due to the way the society we grow up in constructs us and upon which we have hardly any control, especially as a child.   

To conclude, what I would like to stress is that Muslims and many non-Muslims in the West have more in common than they assume, so please, just stop the hate on both sides. In addition, it is important for me to clearly voice that I do not believe men and women are the same. They are not and will never be, gender sameness should be considered a myth. However, men and women deserve to be treated equally, but I am referring to an equality that acknowledges and respects their differences.







Wednesday, 13 February 2013

France and Diversity: Blind to the lack of acceptance?



I got offended by a co-worker the other day.

Took me a while to calm myself down and stop feeling angry inside. In order to get this out of my system I had to write it down. Writing... what a great way to evacuate unpleasant feelings!

The co-worker who upset me, a lady, joined (uninvited) a conversation I was having with a freshly arrived English teacher (a newbie like me). I was politely asking him how he was holding up considering the girl who had the job just before him did not last a week. Yes, teaching can be real tough for some people... tougher than it looks.

The lady started asking about our respective area of studies. When she asked me, I told her I was still a student and we ended up talking about my thesis. She first asked me why I chose this topic. I explained that I chose it because France has very interesting/strange ways of dealing with its minorities. I continued and explained that in France government and institutions (as well as the general public) tend to dislike the idea of communities, particularly religious ones. They refuse the concept of diversity, and refuse to deal with the reality of diversity in “a friendly manner”, for instance they chose to make laws against them, such as the headscarf ban... Such attitude showed that in France we are far from the acceptance and respect minorities can get in countries like the US, UK or Canada.

She first said that she was unaware of the fact that Muslim woman couldn’t wear their headscarf freely... (um, really?). She then strongly disagreed with my statement, because she said that she was married with an African man who would entirely disagree with my statement too (and that was just the weirdest justification).

My new co-worker took my side and started to talk about integration and assimilation. But the lady still had a problem with it. In an attempt to explicate in a “simple” way the problem with France and diversity, I said that in order to do be considered as fully integrated, or rather, assimilated, Muslims in France should drink wine and eat pork. That was very cliché but I thought it explained the point in a straightforward manner.

She replied that wine was good and that “Dans le cochon tout est bon!” (We use everything but the squeal /oink). And then she asked a question that was not exactly related to my work:  “Why aren't Muslims eating pork?” When I told her it was about convictions, she was not satisfied and added: “You must have asked them” – after that it was clear she did not understand the subject of my research, and assumed she knew better than me what my work was about.

When I answered, I explained it was not important to understand why. That it was about freedom of expression and respect of the other people convictions and identities. She answered "Well good, good, I can see you've learned your lesson but what is the fundamental, logical reason being it?" (See the disdain here?)

So I told her that Muslim do this out of faith and belief, no matter the various “logical” reasons one could find to this particular practice. She clearly could not accept the idea because for her having faith and acting on personal conviction was not enough for someone to do something. She even added that if it was true it was “scary".

What else could have I said after that aside for “Sorry got to go, have a class...”? There was no way the conversation would go anywhere if the simple idea that not eating pork was a habit made out of an order that the faithful believer considers divine sounded ridiculous and scary to her.

Why can’t she understand that it is not about understanding but respecting? For both the faithful and for her?

Anyway, I had reached a dead end. And the funny thing is that she proved that I was right to tell her that France has problems accepting diversity. Indeed, her condescending remarks towards my answers, and her general lack of respect in her attitude, strongly demonstrated that she was not that tolerant. Marrying a Black man or an Asian lady doesn’t make a person tolerant or respectful of other cultures or religions – let this be clear. It is not about skin colour. It’s about respecting other people’s belief and not ridicule them for expressing their difference. Try to understand that these people can be the very same colour as you, can be born in the very same country as you and call themselves the same as you: FRENCH.

Anyway, my point is: French people are often uninformed, yet condescending. By acting like she did, she just demonstrated my point and she did not even realise it. Consequently, I will not discuss any of my business with anyone else on the workplace because I don’t want to know the limit of my co-workers open-mindedness, and I really don’t want any unnecessary tension. That was the very first and the very last time I discuss something that was unrelated to teaching or students with a co-worker.